KEBIJAKAN PIDANA MATI DALAM RKUHP DITINJAU DARI ASPEK POLITIK HUKUM DAN HAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01003.10Keywords:
Death Penalty, the Draft of Criminal Code, Legal Policy, Human Right, ModerationAbstract
Abstract
The conflicts between groups to abolish and retains the death penalty seek to be mediated by a death penalty moderation model contained in the Draft of Criminal Code (RKUHP) currently discussed by the House of the Representatives (DPR) and the Government. This article is a normative juridical research using statute, conceptual and philosophical approach. The results showed that the death penalty policy in RKUHP is in accordance with the national legal policy both permanent and temporary. The model of death penalty policy adopted by RKUHP is deemed not to be contradictory to Human Rights because although it does not abolish the death penalty, RKUHP places death penalty in the formulation as a special criminal punishment and is threatened alternatively.
Abstrak
Pertentangan antara kelompok yang hendak menghapuskan pidana mati (abolisionis) dan yang mempertahankan pidana mati (retensionis) berupaya ditengahi dengan model moderasi pidana mati yang terdapat dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (RKUHP) yang saat ini dibahas DPR dan Pemerintah. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan filosofis (philosophical approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kebijakan pidana mati dalam RKUHP telah sesuai dengan politik hukum tetap dan temporer. Model kebijakan pidana mati yang dianut RKUHP dipandang tidak bertentangan dengan Hak Asasi Manusia karena walaupun tidak menghapuskan pidana mati, RKUHP menempatkan pidana mati dalam rumusan sebagai pidana pokok yang bersifat khusus dan diancamkan secara alternatif.
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Buku
Atmasasmita, Romli. Rekonstruksi Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2017.
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. Draft Naskah Akademis RKUHP. Jakarta: BPHN, 2015.
Muladi. Hak Asasi Manusia: Hakekat, Konsep dan Implikasinya dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2009.
Manan, Bagir. Politik Perundang-Undangan, Makalah, Jakarta, November 1993
Nawawi Arief, Barda. Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 1998.
_________________. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif kajian perbandingan. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.
_________________. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
_________________. Bunga Rampai: Kebjiakan Hukum Pidana, Perkembangan Konsep Penyusunan KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2014.
Rahadjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum, Cet. III. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1991.
Rahayu. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2012.
Wahyono, Padmo. Indonesia Negara Berdasarkan atas Hukum, Cet. II. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1986.
Jurnal
Susanto, Mei dan Ajie Ramdan. “Kebijakan Moderasi Pidana Mati, Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2-3/PUU-V/2007â€. Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 10, No. 2, (Agustus 2017): 212.
Konradus, Danggur. “Politik Hukum Berdasarkan Konstitusiâ€. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol. 45, No. 3, (Juli 2016): 205
Matompo, Osgar S. “Pembatasan Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Prespektif Keadaan Daruratâ€. Jurnal Media Hukum Vol. 21, No.1, (Juni 2014): 64
Anjari, Warih. “Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusiaâ€. E-Journal WIDYA Yustisia Vol. 1, No. 2, (Maret 2015): 112.
Naskah Internet
Mohamad Faiz, Pan. “Embrio dan Perkembangan Pembatasan Ham Di Indonesiaâ€, Bahan Pengantar “Online Discussion†di salah satu Forum Hukum. https://panmohamadfaiz.com/2007/11/19/pembatasan-hak-asasi-manusia-di-indonesia/. Diakses 28 September 2017.
Hukum Online. “Penerapan Hukuman Mati Dinilai Tidak Melanggar Konstitusiâ€. http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt548e9fcb51d1d/penerapan-hukuman-mati-dinilai-tidak-melanggar-konstitusi. Diakses Agustus 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Ajie Ramdan, Rully Herdita Ramadhani, Mei Susanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal embed or display simple machine-readable CC licensing information. This journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC). This license (CC BY NC) allows other users to re-edit / rewrite and rebuild a work non-commercially as long as the user gives credit and licenses his new work in the same domain.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).