• Rizky Banyualam Permana Universitas Indonesia



Dispute settlement, RCEP, Trade agreement


In 2020, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement was signed. The RCEP Agreement is the largest regional trade agreement in the world in terms of total GDP. In the Asia-Pacific region, there are various regional and bilateral trade agreements that lead to not only overlapping of substantive provisions, but also overlapping of dispute settlement for a. It is important to review the procedural aspects RCEP agreement to as the means to enforce the rules and commitments in the RCEP for its member countries, especially with regard to Indonesia. This study concludes that although the RCEP has its own dispute resolution mechanism procedures, the formulation of the provisions in the RCEP shows compromise of the negotiation outcome, typical in ASEAN agreements. This would become the hindrance to the effective implementation and implementation of the agreement.

Author Biography

Rizky Banyualam Permana, Universitas Indonesia

Researcher at Djokosoetono Research Center Faculty of Law Universitas Indonesia

Executive Secretary at Center for International Law Studies (Lembaga Pengkajian Hukum Internasional)


Kumpulan Tulisan dalam Buku

Toohey, Lisa. “Dispute Settlement in the TPP and the WTO: Which Way Will Asian TPP Members Turn?” In Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law Rule-Making, edited by Julien Chaisse, Henry Gao, and Chang-fa Lo, 87-104. Singapore: Springer, 2017.

Oishi, Miko. “Introduction: ASEAN Way of Conflict Management Under Challenge.” In Contemporary Conflicts in Southeast Asia: Towards a New ASEAN Way of Conflict Management, edited by Mikio Oishi, 1-18. Springer, 2016.

Cohen, Harlan Grant. “Theorizing Precedent in International Law.” In Interpretation in International Law, edited by Andrea Bianchi, Daniel Peat, and Matthew Windsor, 107-124. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.


Anuradha, R. V. “Liberalization of Trade in Services Under RCEP: Mapping the Key Issues.” Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy Vol. 8, No. 2, (2013): 401-420.

Elms, Deborah K. “Getting RCEP across the Line.” World Trade Review Vol. 20, No. 3, (2021): 373–80. doi:10.1017/S1474745620000592.

Fukunaga, Yoshifumi. “ASEAN’s Leadership in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.” Asia & The Pacific Policy Studies Vol. 2, No. 1, (2014).

Gantz, David A. “The TPP and RCEP: Mega-Trade Agreements for the Pacific Rim,” Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law Vol. 33, No.1, (2016).

Gaur, Pankhuri. “India’s withdrawal from RCEP: Neutralizing National Trade Concerns.” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy Vol. 27, No. 2, (2022): 270–88. doi:

Hamanaka, Shintaro. “TPP versus RCEP: Control of Membership and Agenda Setting.” Journal of East Asian Economic Integration Vol. 18, No. 2, (2014).

Hartman, Stephen W. “The WTO, the Doha Round Impasse, PTAs, and FTAs/RTAs.” The International Trade Journal Vol. 27, No. 5, (2017). doi: 10.1080/08853908.2013.827903

Langford, Malcolm, et. al. “Special Issue: UNCITRAL and Investment Arbitration Reform: Matching Concerns and Solutions an Introduction,” The Journal of World Investment and Trade Vol. 21, (2020).

Lewis, Meredith K. “The TPP and the RCEP (ASEAN+6) as Potential Paths Toward Deeper Asian Economic Integration.” Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy Vol. 8, No. 2, (2013).

Panda, Jagannath P. “Factoring the RCEP and the TPP: China, India and the Politics of Regional Integration.” Strategic Analysis Vol. 38, No. 1, (2014). doi:10.1080/09700161.2014.863462.

Wilson, Jeffrey D. “Mega-Regional Trade Deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing Between the TPP and RCEP?”. Journal of Contemporary Asia Vol. 45, No. 2, (2015).

Wu, Chien-Huei. “ASEAN at the Crossroads: Trap and Track between CPTPP and RCEP,” Journal of International Economic Law Vol. 23, No. 1, (2020).

Yu, Peter K. “The RCEP and Trans-Pacific Intellectual Property Norms.” Vanderbilt Law Review Vol. 50, No. 3, (2021).

Zainuddin, Muhamad Rias K. V., Tamat Sarmidi, and Norlin Khalid. “Sustainable Production, Non-Tariff Measures, and Trade Performance in RCEP Countries.” Sustainability Vol. 12, No. 23, (2020). doi:


Baldwin, Richard E. “Managing the Noodle Bowl: The Fragility of East Asian Regionalism.” ADB Working Paper, 2007.

Basu Das, Sanchita. “RCEP and TPP: Comparisons and Concerns.” ISEAS Perspective, 2013.

Bhagwati, Jagdish. “US Trade Policy: Infatuation with FTAs.” Columbia University Discussion Paper Series No. 726.

Creamer, Cosette D. “Between the Letter of the Law and the Demands of Politics: Judicial Balancing of Trade Authority within the WTO.” Harvard University,

Fukunaga, Yoshifumi, and Ikumo Isono. “Taking ASEAN+1 FTAs towards the RCEP: A Mapping Study.” ERIA Discussion Paper Series ERIA-DP-2013-02.

McDougall, R. “Regional Trade Agreement Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: Modes, Challenges and Options for Effective Dispute Resolution.” RTAExchange, April 2018.

Petri, Peter A., and Michael G. Plummer. “East Asia Decouples from the United States: Trade War, COVID-19, and East Asia’s New Trade Blocs.” PIIE Working Paper, June 2020.

Schill, Stephan W., and Geraldo Vidigal. “Reforming Dispute Settlemen in Trade: The Contribution of Mega-Regionals.” ICTSD Think Piece, April 2018.

Villanueva, Kevin H.R., and Rosario G. Manalo. “ASEAN Consensus: The Intangible Heritage of Southeast Asian Diplomacy.” ERIA,

Konvensi Internasional

ASEAN Charter (2007)

ASEAN Protocol on Enhanced Dispute Settlement Mechanism, (2019)

Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (2020)


The Economist. “The meaning of RCEP, the world’s biggest trade agreement.” The Economist, November 15, 2020.

Suvannaphakdy, Sithanonxay. “Multiplicative effects of RCEP on ASEAN trade.” ASEAN Post, March 15, 2020.

Ammurabi, Syah Deva. “Negosiator Targetkan RCEP Siap 2020, Selanjutnya Ratifikasi.” Gatra, October 22, 2019.

Yustinus Andri DP. “Perundingan RCEP: Payung Hukum Pengganti ISDS Dibutuhkan.”

Ewing-Chow, Michael and Junianto James Losari. “The RCEP Investment Chapter: A State-to-State WTO Style System For Now.”


ASEAN, “Joint Declaration on the Launch of Negotiations for the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership,”

ASEAN, Australia, China, India, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, “Guiding Principles and Objectives for Negotiating the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership,”

ASEAN, Australia, China, Japan, Korea dan New Zealand, “Joint Leader’s Statement on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnersip,” 15 November 2021,

New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade,




How to Cite