ISU KESEHATAN DALAM SENGKETA IMPOR DAGING AYAM ANTARA INDONESIA – BRAZIL DI WTO

Authors

  • Ari Siswanto Faculty of Law, Satya Wacana Christian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.2

Keywords:

ambiguity of norms, GATT / WTO, human health protection, international trade disputes, principles of necessity.

Abstract

Abstract

This paper discusses the issue of human health protection as one of the exceptions of GATT obligations, considering the elements in Article XX (b) of GATT are still general in nature and thus have the potential to bring different interpretation. Focusing on the elements of "necessary to protect human life or health" and "arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination", this paper seeks to explore the various meanings of Article XX (b) GATT, including its implementation in an in concreto dispute, namely Indonesia's dispute with Brazil over chicken meat import policy. The result shows that the element of "necessary to protect human life or health" will be deemed if the state can demonstrate the existence of health risks, adopt necessary policies that mitigate such risks, and there is no other policy alternative more friendly to international trade available. In relation to the more subjective element of "arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination", the principle of good faith has not yet given a place in the consideration of this element.


Abstrak

Tulisan ini membahas isu perlindungan kesehatan manusia sebagai salah satu pengecualian dari kewajiban-kewajiban GATT, mengingat bahwa unsur-unsur dalam Artikel XX(b) GATT masih bersifat umum dan berpeluang memunculkan perbedaan penafsiran. Berfokus pada unsur “necessary to protect human life or health†dan “arbitrary or unjustifiable discriminationâ€, tulisan ini menelusuri berbagai pemaknaan terhadap Artikel XX(b) GATT, termasuk implementasinya dalam sengketa in concreto, yakni sengketa Indonesia melawan Brazil terkait kebijakan impor daging ayam. Hasilnya, unsur “necessary to protect human life or health†dianggap terpenuhi kalau negara itu bisa menunjukkan keberadaan risiko kesehatan, mengambil kebijakan yang mampu mengurangi risiko tersebut dan memang harus diambil, serta tidak tersedia alternatif kebijakan lain yang lebih ramah terhadap perdagangan internasional. Terkait unsur “arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination†yang lebih subjektif, terungkap prinsip itikad baik belum mendapat tempat di dalam pertimbangan atas unsur ini.

References

Buku

Bossche, Peter van den and Werner Zdouc. The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization – Text, Cases and Materials, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Epps, Tracey. International Trade and Health Protection – A Critical Assessment of the WTO’s SPS Agreement. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008.

Garner, Bryan A., ed., Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th ed., St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West Publishing, 2004.

Jeutner, Valentin. Irresolvable Norm Conflicts in International Law – The Concept of a Legal Dilemma. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.

Keil, Geert & Ralf Poscher (eds.). Vagueness and Law – Philosophical and Legal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Matsushita, Mitsuo et al., The World Trade Organization – Law, Practice and Policy, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Jurnal

Gorda, A.A.A. Ngr Sri Rahayu. Dkk. “The Analysis Of Tendency On Choice Of Forum In The Settlement Of Dispute Of International Trade Among Asean Countriesâ€. Arena Hukum Vol. 13, No. 1, (April 2020): 24-44.

Mitchell, Andrew D. “Good Faith in WTO Dispute Settlementâ€. Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol 7, No. 2, (2006).

Hidayatullah, Syukri. “Perbandingan Hukum Pengaturan Standardisasi Menurut Agreement TBT dan Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perdaganganâ€. Arena Hukum Vol 9, No. 2, (Agustus 2016): 271-288.

Sihabuddin. “Pengaturan Kebijakan Pemerintah Indonesia Mengenai Tata Niaga Impor Panganâ€. Arena Hukum Vol 8, No 2, (Agustus 2015): 217-235.

Putusan DSB WTO

Canada – Measures Affecting Exports of Unprocessed Herring and Salmon, L/6268 - 35S/98, 22 Maret 1988.

Canada – Measures Affecting Exports of Unprocessed Herring and Salmon, L/6268 - 35S/98, 22 Maret 1988.

European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos – Containing Products, WT/DS135/R, 18 September 2000.

Indonesia – Measures Concerning the Importation of Chicken Meat and Chicken Products, WT/DS484/R, 17 Oktober 2017.

Thailand – Restrictions on Importation of and Internal Taxes on Cigarettes, DS10/R-37S/200, 7 November 1990.

United States – Prohibition of Imports of Tuna and Tuna Products from Canada, L/5198-29S/91, 22 Februari 1982.

United States – Shrimps, WT/DS58/AB/R6, 6 November 1998.

United States – Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services, WT/DS285/R, Panel Report, 10 November 2004.

European Communities – Measures Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal Products, WT/DS400/R & WT/DS401/R, Panel Report, 25 November 2013.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-01

How to Cite

Siswanto, A. (2021). ISU KESEHATAN DALAM SENGKETA IMPOR DAGING AYAM ANTARA INDONESIA – BRAZIL DI WTO. Arena Hukum, 14(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.2

Issue

Section

Artikel