THE SIGNIFICACE OF BALANCING PRINCIPLE WITHIN THE CONTRACT OF MUDHARABAH WA MURABAHA: A CASE IN INDONESIA

Authors

  • Siti Hamidah Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01001.3

Keywords:

principle of balance, contract, linkage program, mudharabahwalmurabahah

Abstract

Abstrak

Asas keseimbangan dalam hukum perjanjian sering diabaikan karena lebih mengutamakan asas utama perjanjian, yaitu asas kebebasan berkontrak, asas konsensual dan asas pacta sunt servanda. Tulisan ini membahas pentingnya asas keseimbangan dalam perjanjian mudharabahwalmurabahah pada program linkage. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum (legal research). Pendekatan yang dipakai untuk penelitian ini adalah Pendekatan filsafati, peraturan perundang-undangan, perbandingan dan pendekatan analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa asas keseimbangan dimaknai sebagai kemanfaatan dan kemaslahatan bagi seluruh pihak yang berkepentingan dengan berlandaskan nilai keadilan yang berkepastian hukum. Perwujudan asas keseimbangan dalam perjanjian mudharabahwalmurabahah adalah berbentuk manfaat yang diterima oleh seluruh pihak yang langsung berkaitan dengan perjanjian, dalam hal ini adalah antara BUS dan LKM, maupun UKM. Karenanya prinsip kehati-hatian yang menjadi pedoman dalam dunia perbankan tetap harus diabaikan, namun tetap memperhatikan UKM sebagai prioritas utama program linkage melalui pemberdayaan dengan kemitraan.

Abstract

The principle of balance tends to be neglected for the contracts prefers the main principle, such as freedom of contact, consensual principle, and pacta sunt servanda. This article discusses the importance of the principle of balance in mudharabahwalmurabahah contract on linkage program. This research is categorized as legal research using philosophical, legislation, comparison and analytical approach. The results show that the reflection of the principal of balance in mudharabahwalmurabahah contract is interpreted as usefulness ann benefit for all parties concerned based on the value of legal justice equity. It can be seen through the benefits gained by all parties involved directly with the contract, in this case between Islamic Bank and the MFI, as well as SME. Hence, the prudential principal that serves as the guidance in the banking world must be kept ignored, yet still pay attention to SME as the main priority of the linkage program through the empowerment with the partnership.

References

BOOKS

Abdullah, Sulaiman. Sumber Hukum Islam, Permasalahan dan Fleksibilitasnya (Islamic Law Sources, Problems and Flexibility). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1995.

Ali, A. M. Asuransi dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam: Suatu Tinjauan Analisis Historis, Teoritis dan Praktis, cet. 1 (Insurance in Islamic Law Perspective: A Historical, Theorytical, and Practical Analysis 1st Edition). Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2014.

Ali, Mohammad Daud. Hukum Islam Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Islam di Indonesia (Islamic Law: Introduction ofLaw Study in Indonesia). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.

Berlianti, Yeni Salma. Prinsip-prinsip Hukum Perdagangan Berdasarka Ketentuan World Trade Organization dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam (Trade Law Principal Based onWorld Trade Organization in Islamic Law Perspective). Jakarta: Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2001.

Budiono, Herlien. Asas Keseimbangan bagi Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia, Hukum Perjanjian Berdasarkan Asas-asas Wigati Indonesia (Equity Principle for Contract Law in Indonesia, Contract Law Based on Wigati Principle in Indonesia). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.

______________. Collection of Perdata Law Writings in Notariate Fields, Third Book. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2015.

Chapra, Umer. Islam and Economic Challenge. USA: MIT, 1992.

Dewi, Gemala. Hukum Perikatan Islam di Indonesia (Islamic Contract Law in Indonesia). Jakarta: Kencana, 2005.

Haris, Ahmad Faidy. The Spirit of Islamic Law, Membongkar Teori Hukum Statis Menuju Hukum Dinamis. Yogjakarta: SUKA-Press, 2012.

Hernoko, Agus Yudha. Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial (Contract Law and Proportionality Principlein Commercial Contract). Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.

Karim, Adiwarman A. Bank Islam Analisis Fiqih dan Keuangan (Islamic Banking: Fiqih Analysis and Finance). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.

Khadduri, Majid. Teologi Keadilan Perspektif Islam (Justice Theology in Islamic Perspective) translation of “The Islamic Conception of Justiceâ€. Surabaya: Risalah Gusti, 1999.

Khairandy, Ridwan. Itikad Baik dalam Kebebasan Berkontrak (Good Will in Contract Freedom). Jakarta: Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2003.

Khallaf, Abdul Wahhab. Kaidah-kaidah Hukum Islam (Islamic Law Guides: (‘IlmuUshuli’l-Fiqh)) Volume II, translated by M. Tolchah Mansoeret. al. Bandung: Risalah, 1985.

Lebacqz, Karen. Teori-Teori Keadilan, Analisis Kritis Terhadap Pemikiran J.S. Kill, John Rawls, Robert Nozick, Reinhold Neibuhr, Jose Porfirio Miranda (Theory of Justice, Critical Analysis on the Thoughts of J.S. Kill, John Rawls, Robert Nozick, Reinhold Neibuhr, Jose Porfirio Miranda), Original Title: Six Theories of Justice, Indiana Polis: Augsbung Publishing House, translated by Yudi Santoso, (2011). Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media, 1986.

Mardani. Hukum Perikatan Syariah di Indonesia (Shariah Contract Lawin Indonesia). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 201.3

Mardjono, Hartono. Petunjuk Praktis Menjalankan Syari’at Islam dalam Bermuamalah yang Sah Menurut Hukum Nasional (Practical Guide on Running Legal Islamic Shariah and Muamalah According tothe National Law). Jakarta: Studia Press, 2000.

Naja, Daeng. Akad Bank Syariah (Sharia Bank Agreement). Yogyakarta: PustakaYustisia, 2011.

Qardhawi, Yusuf. Peran nilai dan Moral dalam Perekonomian Islam (Roles of Value and Moral in Islamic Economy). Jakarta: Robbani Press, 1997.

Rato, Dominikus. Filsafat Hukum Mencari: Memahami dan Memahami Hukum (Law Philosophy: Seeking and Understanding Law). Yogjakarta: Laksbang Pressindo, 2010.

Rawls, John. Teori Keadilan, Dasar-dasar Filsafat Politik untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Sosial dalam Negara (A Theory of Justice, A Justice Theory, Basics of Political Philosophy to Realize State Social Welfare) Translation from: A Theory of Justice, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, translated by Uzair Fauzan et. al. (2011). Yogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1995.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Perbankan Syariah, Produk-produk dan Aspek-aspek Hukumnya (Shariah Banking, Product and Law Aspects). Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.

Soekanto, Soerjono and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif; Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (Normative Law Research: A Short Rreview). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.

Sula, Muhammad Suakir. Asuransi Syariah (Life and General): Konsep dan Sistem Operasional, cet.1(Shariah Insurance (Life and General): Concept and Operational System, 1st Edition). Jakarta: Gema Insani Perss, 2004.

Suntana, Ija. Politik Hukum Islam (Islamic Law Politics), Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka Setia, 2014.

Syahrani, Riduan. Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum (Summary of Islamic Law Essence). Bandung: Penerbit Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999.

Syaifuddin, Muhammad. Hukum Kontrak Memahami Kontrak dalam Perspektif Filsafat, Teori, Dogmatik, dan Praktik Hukum (Contract Law: Understanding Contract in Perspective of Philosophy, Theory, Dogmatic, danLaw Practice). Bandung: Penerbit Mandar Maju, 2012.

Tim Arsitektur Perbankan Indonesia. Generic Model Linkage Program (Antara Bank Umum Konvensional / Syariah / Unit Usaha Syariah dan BPR Konvensional / Syariah) (Generic Model Linkage Program (Between Conventional / General / Shariah / Shariah Unit Banks and Conventional / Shariah BPR). Jakarta: Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengaturan Perbankan, 2007.

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Hernoko, Agus Yudha. “Prinsip-prinsip dalam Hukum Kontrak dan Asas Proporsionalitas (Principles in Contract Law and Proportionality)â€. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Vol. 29, No. 2, (2010).

Bhakti, R. “Pemberdayaan Umkm Melalui Pembiayaan Dengan Prinsip Bagi Hasil Oleh Lembaga Keuangan Syariahâ€. Arena Hukum Vol. 6, No. 1, (April 2014): 121-137. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2013.00601.7

Hadisumarto bin Mislan Cokro, Widiarto and Abdul Ghafar B. Ismalil. “Improving the Effectiveness of Islamic Micro Financing. Learning from BMT Experienceâ€. Humanomics Vol. 26, No. 1, (2010): 65-75.

Imronuddin and Javed Ghulam Hussain, “Why Do Bank Finance Clients Prefer Mark-Up to Profit Loss Sharing Principles? Evidence From Islamic Rural Banks and Small to Medium Enterprises in Indonesiaâ€, International Journal of Economic and Financial Issues Vol. 6, No. 4, (2016): 1407-1412.

Jensen, Michael C (1994), “Self-Interest Altruism, Incentives, & Agency Theoryâ€, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance Vol. 7, No. 4,(1994): 40-45.

Jusoh, Mansor, Mohd Azlan Shah Zaidi, Tamat Sarmidi, and Mohd Adib Ismail, “Al Murabahah: Implication on Financial Stability and Islamic Finance Modelâ€, Islamiyyat Vol. 35, No. 2, (2013): 47-55.

Khan, Muhammad Akram , “The Role of Goverment in The Economyâ€, The American Journal of Islamic Social Science, Washington, AMSC/III, (1992): 157-160.

Rahman, Abdul Rahim Abdul, “Islamic Microfinance: An Ethical Alternative to Poverty Alleviationâ€, Humanomics 26(4), (2010): 284-295.

Hamidah, S.. “Analisis Kebijakan Linkage Program Lembaga Keuangan Syariah Dalam Rangka Pemberdayaan UKM Di Indonesiaâ€. Arena Hukum Vol 8, No. 2, (Agustus 2016): 185-202. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2015.00802.3

LEGISLATION/CONVENTION

Act No. 1 Year 2013 About Micro Finance Institution, Indonesian State Sheet Year 2013 No. 12, Additionof State Sheet Number Announcement 5394.

Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Perbankan Syariah, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia (Academic Paper of Constitutional Draft about Shariah Banking, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia), (2007), Jakarta.

Peraturan Menteri Negara Koperasi dan Usaha Kecil dan Menengah Republik Indonesia Nomor: 03/Per/M.KUKM/III/2009 Tentang: PedomanUmum Linkage Program Antara Bank Umum Dengan Koperasi.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-17

How to Cite

Hamidah, S. (2018). THE SIGNIFICACE OF BALANCING PRINCIPLE WITHIN THE CONTRACT OF MUDHARABAH WA MURABAHA: A CASE IN INDONESIA. Arena Hukum, 11(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01001.3

Issue

Section

Artikel