HAK GUGAT PEMILIH DAN MASYARAKAT DALAM PERSELISIHAN HASIL PILKADA CALON TUNGGAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01002.7Keywords:
The head of regional election dispute, One candidate, Legal standingAbstract
Abstract This research discusses the rights of voters and communities in the head of regional election disputes with one candidate. However, the rights of voters and communities have not regulated in the Head of Regional Election Act. The problem is that the enactment of the Head of Regional Election Act restricts the rights of voters and communities. This research is a legal research with statue approach, conceptual approach, historical approach, case approach, and using primary and secondary sources in law. This research concluded that the limitation of the rights of voters and communities in the head of regional election disputes based on the Head of Regional Election Act resulted that the voters and communities have not legal standing in the head of regional election disputes, so that the provisions of the Constitutional Court were not accepted, despite the fact that there were violations in the implementation head of regional election that destroy democracy.
Abstrak
Penelitian dalam artikel ini membahas hak gugat pemilih dan masyarakat dalam perselisihan hasil Pilkada calon tunggal. Namun hak gugat pemilih dan masyarakat tersebut belum diatur di dalam Undang Undang Pilkada. Permasalahannya berlakunya Undang Undang Pilkada serta perubahannya membatasi hak gugat pemilih dan masyarakat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan historis, dan pendekatan kasus, serta bersumber pada bahan-bahan hukum primer dan bahan-bahan hukum sekunder. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pembatasan hak gugat pemilih dan masyarakat dalam perselisihan hasil Pilkada pada Undang Undang Pilkada serta perubahannya mengakibatkan pemilih dan masyarakat tidak memiliki kedudukan hukum dalam perselisihan hasil Pilkada, sehingga selama persyaratan kedudukan hukum tidak terpenuhi, maka amar putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi adalah tidak dapat diterima, meskipun pada kenyataannya terjadi pelanggaran-pelanggaran dalam pelaksanaan Pilkada yang menciderai demokrasi.
References
Buku
Fadjar, A. Mukthie. Pemilu, Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu, dan Demokrasi, Membangun Pemilu Legislatif, Presiden, dan Kepala Daerah dan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu secara Demokratis. Malang: Setara Press, 2013.
Gaffar, Jenedjri M. Demokrasi dan Pemilu di Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2013.
_________. Politik Hukum Pemilu. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2013.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2005.
Nugroho, Susanti Adi. Class Action dan Perbandingannya dengan Negara Lain. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
Pamungkas, Sigit. Perihal Pemilu. Yogyakarta: Laboratorium Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gajah Mada, 2009.
Siahaan, Maruarar. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.
The Ace Electoral Network and The Encyclopaedia, Results Management Systems. ACE Electoral Knowledge Network, 2013.
Jurnal
Aceves, William J. “Actio Popularis - The Class Action in International Lawâ€. University of Chicago Legal Forum Article 9, (2003): 354-401.
Mossop, David. “Citizen Suits - Tools for Improving Compliance with Environmental Lawsâ€. Environmental Crime, 11.
Pusat Kajian Konstitusi FH-Universitas Brawijaya. “Implikasi Putusan MK No. 102/PUU-VII/2009 Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Studi di Kabupaten Malang dan Kota Pasuruan)â€. Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 8 No. 1, (Februari 2011): 152-153.
Rogers, George R. “Legislative Intent vs. Executive Non-Enforcement: A New Bounty Statute as a Solution to Executive Usurpation of Congressional Power Legislativeâ€. Indiana Law Journal Article 17, Volume 69, Issue 4, (Fall 1994): 1261.
Surat Kabar
Komisi Pemilihan Umum. “Calon Tunggal dan Nasib Pilkada 2015â€, Suara
Komisi Pemilihan Umum, Edisi IV, (Juli - Agustus 2015): 40.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 196-197-198/PHPU.D-VIII/2010.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 97/PUU-XI/2013.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 100/PUU-XIII/2015.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 79/PHP.BUP-XIV/2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Indra Fajrul Falah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal embed or display simple machine-readable CC licensing information. This journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC). This license (CC BY NC) allows other users to re-edit / rewrite and rebuild a work non-commercially as long as the user gives credit and licenses his new work in the same domain.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
