PERBANDINGAN PENGATURAN PENYELENGGARAN PENDIDIKAN PROFESI ADVOKAT (PPA) DI INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2017.01001.7Keywords:
AdvokatAbstract
Abstract
This research is intended to examine the organization of advocate professional education in Indonesia and United States as well as how the organization of advocate professional education should be applied in Indonesia. This research was conducted by normative method that analyzes the data with referring to the legal norms contained in legislation and judicial decisions as well as using a comparative approach (comparative law) to United States. The results show that the First, there are differences in the organization of Advocate Education in Indonesia and United States. Organization of advocate professional education in the United States conducted by the law school while in Indonesia carried out by the Advocates organization. Secondly, Advocates professional education in Indonesia should not be in the form of Special Education Advocate Profession (PKPA). Special Education Advocate Profession actually is a form of professional education. Professional Education as part of a higher education course should meet national standards of higher education.
Â
Abstrak
Advokat merupakan salah satu profesi hukum yang memiliki peran penting dalam system peradilan pidana Indonesia. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pengaturan penyelenggaraan pendidikan profesi advokat di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat serta bagaimana penyelenggaraan pendidikan profesi advokat yang seharusnya diterapkan di Indonesia. Tulisan ini merupakan hasil dari satu penelitian yang menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan menggunakan pendekatan perbandingan hukum (comparative law) terhadap Amerika Serikat. Â Hasil penelitian tersebut menunjukan bahwa penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Profesi Advokat di Amerika dilakukan oleh sekolah hukum sedangkan di Indonesia dilakukan oleh organisasi Advokat. Pendidikan profesi Advokat di Indonesia seharusnya bukan dalam bentuk Pendidikan Khusus Profesi Advokat. Pendidikan Profesi Advokat sejatinya merupakan bentuk pendidikan profesi. Pendidikan Profesi Advokat sebagai bagian dari pendidikan tinggi tentunya harus memunuhi standar nasional pendidikan tinggi.
References
Buku
Alkostar, Artidjo. Peran dan Tantangan Advokat Dalam Era Globalisasi. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2010.
Azhari. Negara Hukum Indonesia Analisis Yuridis Normatif Tentang Unsur-unsurnya. Jakarta: Ul Press, 1995.
Blocher dan Bigs. The Cognitive Approach to Ethical Counseling. New York: State University of New York, 1986.
Dicey, V. Albert. Introduction to the Study of the Law of Consititution. 8th Revised edition. Liberty Fund Inc, 1982.
Dworkin, Ronald. Legal Research. Spring: Daedalus, 1973.
Konrad, Zweigert and Kotz Hein. Introduction to Comparative Law. 3d ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
McMorrow, A. Judith. Comparative Legal Education: An Introduction to US Legal Education and Preparation for the Practice of Law. Boston College Law School: Electronic Copy, 2009.
Moleong, J. Lexy. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2002.
Pinsler, Jeffrey. Ethic and Professional Responsibility, A Code For Advocate and Solicitor. Singapore: Academy Publising, 2007.
Prent , K., et al. Kamus Latin-Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1969.
Sarmadi, Sukris. Advokat Litigasi & Non Litigasi Pengadilan. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2009.
Jurnal
Choudhry, Sujit. “Globalization in Search of Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation.†74 Ind. L. J. 819, (1999): 825-826.
Raalf, Matthew S. “A Sheep in Wolf's Clothing: Why the Debate Surrounding Comparative Constitutional Law Is Spectacularly Ordinary.†73 Fordham L. Rev.: 1239, (Desember 2004): 1279-1281.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-undang No. 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat.
Undang-undang No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-undang No. 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Tinggi dan Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi.
Peraturan Presiden No. 8 Tahun 2012 tentang Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia.
Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi No. 44 Tahun 2015 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi.
Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung No. 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015.
Peraturan Peradi No. 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Khusus Profesi Advokat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 014/PUU-IV/2006.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 015/PUU-IV/2006.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 101/PUU-VII/2009.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 66/PUU-VIII/2010.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 112/PUU-XII/2014.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 36/PUU-XIII/2015.
Surat Ketua Mahkamah Agung No. 052/KMA/V/2009.
Surat Ketua Mahkamah Agung No. 089/KMA/VI/2010.
Surat Ketua Mahkamah Agung No. 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015.
Naskah Internet
American Bar Association. “ABA Standard and Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools 2015-2016â€, â€. http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/misc/legal_education/Standards/2015_2016_chapter_3.authcheckdam.pdf. Diakses 25 Juni 2016.
_________________. “History of the American Bar Associationâ€. http://www.americanbar.org/content/aba/about_the_aba/history.html. Diakses 25 Juni 2016.
Cipto, Hendra. Peradi Pecah Tiga, “Masing-Masing Kubu Punya Ketua Umumâ€. http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2015/03/28/09095281/Peradi.Pecah.Tiga.Masing-Masing.Kubu.Punya.Ketua.Umum. Diakses 13 Februari 2016.
McMorrow, Judith A. “Comparative Legal Education: An Introduction to US Legal Education and Preparation for the Practice of Lawâ€,. Boston College Law School, : Electronic Copy, 2009, . Ddalam http://ssrn.com/abstract=2076718. Diakses 18 Juli 2016.
New York State Assitance Trust. “Are You Fit To Be A Lawyerâ€. http://www.nylat.org/publications/brochures/documents/characterandfitnessbrochure09.pdf. Diakses 5 Agustus 2016.
Winarta, Frans Hendra. “Konflik Antar Pengurus Organisasi Advokat yang Berkepanjanganâ€. http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol22359/konflik-antar-pengurus-organisasi-advokat-yang-berkepanjangan. Diakses 12 Februari 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Arif Setiawan, Lucky Suryo Wicaksono, Siti Anisah, Eko Rial Nugroho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal embed or display simple machine-readable CC licensing information. This journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC). This license (CC BY NC) allows other users to re-edit / rewrite and rebuild a work non-commercially as long as the user gives credit and licenses his new work in the same domain.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
