PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN RINGAN PADA PROSES DIVERSI TINGKAT PENYIDIKAN

Authors

  • Arfan Kaimuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2015.00802.7

Keywords:

Pencurian

Abstract

Absrtact
This research published as journal is written and motivated by three issues. First is the juridical problems that can be observed from the inconsistency of the Act Number 11 of 2012 on the SPPA from article 1, paragraph (6) of the restorative justice to Article 9 paragraph (2). It has distorted the concept of restorative justice for victims of crime minor theft. The Second is the theoretical issues, that is the right of victims to be protected, but in practice these rights are neglected. the Third issue is the sociological problems that can be observed where the criminal acts of theft committed by a child can interfere with the comfort and safety of the community. This research's objective is to find a basic philosophical formation of Article 9, paragraph (2) of Act No. 11/2012 on SPPA. To describe how should the diversion of the victims of wage theft with losses under local minimum wage was implemented. This journal is written using normative legal research methods. Basic formation of Article 9 (2) Article 9 paragraph (2) of Law No. 11/2012 on SPPA included four main points, three points are meant to protect children in order to avoid prison and then the fourth point is to protect the interests of victims and perpetrators of child. If the victim does not wish to participate, diversion will still run. This philosophical basis is in contrary to the theory of restorative justice and legal protection. In comparison to the Diversion process of Philippines dan Malaysia state, to achieve the ideal form of diversion for criminal offenses minor committed by children in Indonesia is to use a restorative justice approach in a diversion effort. It is supported by the theory of criminal law policy, which is by reformulating and altering the content of Article 9 paragraph (2) of the SPPA.

Absrtak
Penulisan jurnal berupa hasil penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh tiga permasalahan. Pertama, permasalahan yuridis yang bisa dicermati dari adanya inkonsistensi dalam UU No. 11 tahun 2012 tentang SPPA yakni antara pasal 1 ayat (6) mengenai restorative justice dengan Pasal 9 ayat (2). Hal ini telah mencederai konsep restorative justice bagi korban tindak pidana pencurian ringan. Kedua, permasalahan teoritis, Hak-hak korban harus dilindungi, namun dalam praktek hak tersebut terabaikan. Ketiga, permasalahan sosiologis yang bisa dicermati ialah Tindak pidana pencurian yang dilakukan oleh anak dapat mengganggu kenyamanan dan keamanan di dalam masyarakat. Tujuan penelitian ini Untuk menemukan dasar filosofis pembentukan Pasal 9 ayat (2) UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 tentang SPPA. Untuk menguraikan bagaimana semestinya proses diversi terhadap korban pencurian yang kerugiannya dibawah upah minum provinsi setempat dilaksanakan. Penulisan jurnal ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Dasar pembentukan Pasal 9 ayat (2) Pasal 9 ayat (2) UU No. 11/2012 tentang SPPAterdapat empat poin utama, tiga poin bertujuan untuk melindungi anak agar terhindar dari penjara kemudian poin keempat yaitu melindungi kepentingan korban dan juga pelaku anak. Apabila korban tidak ingin berpartisipasi, diversi tetap akan dijalankan. Dasar filosofis tersebut bertentangan dengan teori restorative justice dan juga teori perlindungan hukum.Setalah melakukan perbandingan Proses diversi dengan Negara Filiphina dan Malaysia, untuk mencapai bentuk ideal diversi untuk tindak pidana pencurian ringan yang dilakukan oleh anak di Indonesia ialah dengan menggunakan pendekatan restorative justice pada upaya diversi. Hal ini didukungoleh teori kebijakan hukum pidana. Dengan mereformulasi untuk merubah isi dari Pasal 9 ayat (2) UU SPPA.

References

Buku

Adi Kusno, 2009, Diversi Sebagai Upaya Alternatif Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Oleh Anak, UMM Pres, Malang.

Barda Nawawi Arif, 1996, Kebijakan Legislatif dalam Penanggulangan kejahtan dengan Pidana Penjara, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Arif Barda Nawawi, 2008, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Kencana, Jakarta.

Romli Atmasasmita, 1992, Teori dan Kapita Selekta Kriminologi, Refika Aditama, Surabaya.

Maya Indah, 2014, Perlindungan Korban Suatu Perspektif Viktimologi dan Kriminologi, Kencana Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.

Dikdik M Arif Mansur dan Gultom Elisatris, 2006, Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan Antara Norma dan Realita, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Marlina, 2009, Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia,Refika Aditama, Medan.

Philipus M. Hadjon, 1987, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Bina Ilmu, Surabaya.

Abintoro Prakoso, 2013, Kriminilogi dan Hukum Pidana, Laksbang Grafika, Jember.

Wagiati Soetedjo dan Melani, 2013, Hukum Pidana Anak, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Rena Yulia, 2009, Viktimologi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan, Graha Ilmu, Bandung.

Bambang Waluyo, 2011, Viktimologi Perlindungan Korban dan Saksi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Naskah Internet

Van der Schaar, Kemiskinan di Indonesia, http://indonesia-investments.com.

Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 1945.

Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana.

Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Undang-undang No. 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.

Undang-undang No. 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.

Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006 (Republic Act No. 9344) Filiphina.

Child Act 2001 Malaysia.

Perma Nomor 2 tahun 2012 tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan dan Jumlah Denda dalam KUHP.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-03

How to Cite

Kaimuddin, A. (2016). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN RINGAN PADA PROSES DIVERSI TINGKAT PENYIDIKAN. Arena Hukum, 8(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2015.00802.7

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Artikel

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Arfan Kaimuddin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This journal embed or display simple machine-readable CC licensing information. This journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC). This license (CC BY NC) allows other users to re-edit / rewrite and rebuild a work non-commercially as long as the user gives credit and licenses his new work in the same domain.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).