KEADILAN BAGI PENYALAHGUNA NARKOTIKA DI INDONESIA

Authors

  • Rita Komalasari YARSI University
  • Nurhayati Nurhayati Prasetiya Mulya University
  • Cecep Mustafa University of Stirling

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01403.4

Keywords:

keadilan kondisional, faktor yang mempengaruhi, pengaruh politik dan publik

Abstract

Artikel ini menyajikan persepsi para Hakim Indonesia dalam menjatuhkan hukuman terhadap pengguna narkotika. Hakim memegang peran sentral dalam proses hukuman, dan karena kebijaksanaan yudisial mereka dapat menggunakannya adalah penting untuk memahami bagaimana hakim sampai pada keputusan hukuman mereka. Untuk mengembangkan pemahaman tentang bagaimana hakim, memahami tindakan mereka dalam pengambilan keputusan kepada pengguna narkotika, sejumlah 31 peserta hakim diwawancarai. Data menunjukkan bahwa keadilan disajikan sebagai kondisional, tergantung pada berbagai faktor yang mempengaruhi yang terutama, meskipun tidak sepenuhnya, sebagai salah satu ketegangan dan kontradiksi. Faktor yang mempengaruhi putusan hakim salah satunya adalah politik dan aparat hukumnya.  Artikel ini berkontribusi pada persepsi para hakim yang dipengaruhi oleh faktor yuridis dan faktor sosiologis.

References

Jurnal

Ashworth, A. Sentencing and criminal justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2010

Ashworth, A. European sentencing traditions: accepting divergence or aiming for convergence? In: C. Tata and N.Hutton eds. Sentencing and society: international perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 219-236. (2002)

Ashworth, A. Responsibilities, rights and restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42(3), 578-595. (2002)

Babor, T. Drug policy and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (2010)

Duff, R.A. Punishment, communication, and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press). (2001)

Duff, R. A. Responsibility, restoration, and retribution. Retributivism has a past: has it a future, 63-85. (2011)

Feeley, M. M. The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. Russell Sage Foundation. (1992)

Hart, H. L. A., Raz, J., Bulloch, P. A., and Green, L. The concept of law. 3rd. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (2012)

Hudson, B. Justice in the risk society: challenging and re-affirming 'justice' in late modernity. London: Sage. (2003a)

Hudson, B. Understanding justice: an introduction to ideas, perspectives, and controversies in modern penal theory. Buckingham: Open University Press. (2003b)

Hutton, N. Sentencing as a social practice. In: S. Armstrong and L. McAra eds. Perspectives on punishment: the contours of control, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.155-174. (2006)

Mason, J. Qualitative research. London: Sage. (2007)

Nadelmann, E.A. Criminologists and punitive drug prohibition: to serve or to challenge? Criminology & Public Policy, 3(3), pp.441-450. (2004)

Nolan, J.L. Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (2003)

Reimann, M., & Zimmermann, R. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of comparative law. Oxford University Press. (2019).

Stevens, A., Berto, D., Frick, U., Hunt, N., Kerschl, V., McSweeney, T., Oeuvray, K., Puppo, I., Santa Maria, A., Schaaf, S., Trinkl, B., Uchtenhagen, A., and Werdenich, W. The relationship between legal status, perceived pressure and motivation in treatment for drug dependence: results from a European study of Quasi-Compulsory Treatment. European Addiction Research, 12(4), pp.197-209. (2006)

Tombs, J. [A unique punishment] Sentencing and the prison population in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Consortium on Crime & Criminal Justice. (2004) Available: http://www.scccj.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/A-Unique-Punishment.pdf [Accessed 25 February 2015] Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.

Ward, J. Punishing drug possession in the magistrates' courts: time for a rethink. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 19(4), pp.289-307. (2013)

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Komalasari, R., Nurhayati, N., & Mustafa, C. (2021). KEADILAN BAGI PENYALAHGUNA NARKOTIKA DI INDONESIA. Arena Hukum, 14(3), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01403.4

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 3 (2021)

Section

Artikel

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Rita Komalasari, Nurhayati Nurhayati, Cecep Mustafa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This journal embed or display simple machine-readable CC licensing information. This journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC). This license (CC BY NC) allows other users to re-edit / rewrite and rebuild a work non-commercially as long as the user gives credit and licenses his new work in the same domain.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).