PERLINDUNGAN EKSPRESI BUDAYA TRADISIONAL INDONESIA DALAM SISTEM YANG SUI GENERIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01303.1Keywords:
Protection, Indonesian Traditional Cultural Expressions, Sui GenerisAbstract
AbstractThis Paper aims to analyze the importance of Indonesian traditional cultural expressionsgoverned by sui generis. To obtain these objectives, this legal research uses statutory approach
with a systematic interpretation. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the regulation
of Indonesian traditional cultural expression in Law Number 28 of 2014 about Copyright still
cannot realize the protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions due to differences in
charateristic between copyright with Traditional Cultural Expression.
Â
Abstrak
Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pentingnya ekspresi budaya tradisional Indonesia diatur secara sui generis. Untuk memperoleh tujuan tersebut, penelitian hukum ini menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dengan penafsiran sistematis. Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa pengaturan ekspresi budaya tradisional Indonesia dalam Undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta masih belum dapat mewujudkan perlindungan terhadap Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional karena adanya perbedaan karakteristik antara hak cipta dengan ekspresi budaya tradisional.
References
Buku
Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan HAM Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI. Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual Atas Pengetahuan Tradsional dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Masyarakat Adat, Bandung: Alumni, 2013.
Damian, Eddy. Glosarium Hak Cipta dan Hak Terkait. Bandung: Alumni, 2012.
Hadikusuma, Hilman. Pengantar Hukum Adat. Jakarta: Mandar Maju, 2010.
Janke, Terri. Our Culture: Our Future – Report on Australian Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights. Sydney: Michael Frankel and Company, 1999.
Jened, Rahmi. Hukum Hak Cipta (Copyright Law). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
Kusumadara, Afifah. Analysis of The Failure of The Implementation of Intellectual Property Laws in Indonesia, A dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Juridical Studies, Faculty of Law University of Sydney, 2000.
Lidsey, Tim dkk. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Alumni, 2002.
Lutviansori, Arif. Hak Cipta dan Perlindungan Folklor di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2010.
Purba, Afrillyana. TRIPS- WTO dan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Indonesia Kajian Perlindungan Hak Cipta Seni Batik Tradisional. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2005.
Rato, Dominikus. Pengantar Hukum Adat. Surabaya: LaksBang Pressindo, 2009.
Roisah, Kholish. Konsep Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sejarah, Pengertian, dan Filosofi Pengakuan HKI dari Masa ke Masa. Malang: Setara Press, 2015.
Sulistiyono, Adi. Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa HaKI (Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual). Solo: Sebelas Maret University Press, 2004.
Susanti, Diah Imaningrum dkk, Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional dan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Malang: Dioma, 2019.
World Intellectual Property Organization, Consolidated Analysis of the Legal Protectiona of Traditional Cultural Expression/ Expression of Folklore, Background Paper I, 2003.
Jurnal
Adanda, Pamela. “Striking a Balance between Intellectual Property Protection of Traditional Knowledge, Cultural Preservation and Access to Knowledgeâ€. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Vol. 17, (November 2012).
Antons, Christoph. “What is “Traditional Cultural Expression?, International Definitions And Their Application in Developing Asiaâ€, WIPO Journal, Vol. 1, Number. 1, (2009): 103-116.
Atsar, Abdul. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengetahuan dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan dan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Ciptaâ€, Jurnal Law Reform Vol. 13, No. 2, (September 2017).
Aulia, M. Zulfa. “Perlindungan Hukum Ekspresi Kreatif Manusia: Telaah Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisionalâ€. Jurnal Hukum No. 3, Vol.14, (Juli 2007).
Bhat, P. Ishwara. “ Protection of Cultural Property Under International Humanitarian Law: Some Emerging Trendsâ€. ISIL Year Book of International Humanitarian and Refugee Law, (2001).
Fischer, Susanna Frederick. “Dick Whittington And Creativity: From Trade To Folklore, From Folklore To Tradeâ€, Symposium “The Power of Stories: Intersections of Law, Literature, and Culture The Dick Whittington Story: Its Influences & Its Impacts, 12 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 5, Texas Wesleyan Law Review, Fall 2005, p. 20.
Husamah. “Mengusung Kembali Khazanah Identitas Budaya Bangsaâ€. Jurnal Bestari Vol 42, (2009).
Kartika, Eva Dewi. “Perlindungan Hukum atas Cerita Rakyat yang Ditulis oleh Pencipta Dalam Rangka Benefit Sharingâ€. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol.48, No. 2, (April-Juni 2018).
Kusumadara, Afifah. “Pemeliharaan dan Pelestarian Pengetahuan Tradisional dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Indonesia: Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Non-Hak Kekayaan Intelektualâ€. Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No.1, (2011).
Lewinski, Silke von. “The Protection Of Folkloreâ€, 11 Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L. 747, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, Summer 2003.
Melianti, Yusna dkk. “Pengaturan Folklor Secara Sui Generis Dalam Undang-undang Tersendiriâ€. Masalah - Masalah Hukum Jilid 45 No. 1, (Januari 2016).
Oseitutu J.J., “A sui generis regime for traditional knowledge; the cultural divide in intellectual property lawâ€, The Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review Vol. 15, No. 1, (2011).
Philips, Jake. “Australia's Heritage Protection Act : An Alternative to Copyright in the Struggle to Protect Communal Interests in Authored Works of Folkloreâ€. Pacific Rim and Policy Journal 18 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J. 547, (August 2009).
Purnamasari, Wulan Anggie. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perselisihan Tradisional dan Ekspresi Budaya Antar Negara : Sengketa Lagu Rasa Sayange Antara Negara Indonesia dan Negara Malaysiaâ€. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Vol. 45 No. 4, (Oktober-Desember 2015).
Rafianti, Laina dan Qoliqina Zolla Sabrina. “Perlindungan bagi ‘Kustodian’ Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Nadran Menurut Hukum Internasional dan Implementasinya dalam Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesiaâ€. Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1, No. 3, (2014).
Rane, Meghana Rao. “Aiming Straight: The Use of Indigenous Customary Lawto Protect Traditional Cultural Expressionsâ€. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Vol. 15 No. 3.
Septarina, Muthia. “Perlindungan Hukum Pengetahuan Tradisional Dalam Konsep Hukum Kekayaan Intelektualâ€. Al’ Adl Vol. VIII, No. 2, (Mei-Agustus 2016).
Setyaningtyas, Ayu Citra dan Endang Sri Kawuryan. “Menjaga Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional di Indonesiaâ€. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungau Vol. 1, No. 2, (September 2016).
Spangler, Stephanie. “When Indigenous Communities Go Digital : Protecting Traditional Cultural Expressions Through Integration of IP and Customary Lawâ€. 27 Cardozo Arts & Ent.L.J.709., Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 2010.
Stoianoff, Natalie and Alpana Roy. “Indigenous Knowledge and Culture in Australia-The Case for Sui Generis Legislationâ€. Monash University Law Review 745, (2015).
Torsen, Molly. “Intellectual Property And Traditional Cultural Expressions: A Synopsis Of Current Issuesâ€, 3 Intercultural Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 199, Intercultural Human Rights Law Review, (2008): 203.
Ying, Kuek Chee. “Protection of Expressions of Folklore/ Traditional Cultural Expressions: To What Extent is Copyright Law the Solution?â€. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law 3/17/2011
Website
Burri, Mira. “Digital Technologies and Traditional Cultural Expressions: A Positive Look at a Difficultt Relationship, International Journal of Cultural Propertyâ€. www.researchgate.net. Accessed 6 October 2009
Sofia, Maya dan Tasya Paramita. “Upaya Pemerintah agar Budaya Indonesia Tak Diklaim Negara Lainâ€. www.life.viva,co,id .
Overview Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), 2015, www.wipo.int.
Samoa Law Reform Commision, The Protection of Samoa’s Traditional Knowledge and Expressions of Culture, Issues Paper IP 08/10, June 2010.
Statistik Kebudayaan 2019, www.publikasi.data.kemdikbud.go.id.
Update Indonesia, Volume V, No. 6- Oktober 2010, Menelusuri Konflik Indonesia-Malaysia, www.theindonesiainstitute.com.
World Intellectual Property Organization, Consolidated Analysis of the Legal Protectiona of Traditional Cultural Expression/ Expression of Folklore, Background Paper I, 2003. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/19/INF/7 (‘Glossary of Key Terms Related to Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions’), www.wipo.int.
WIPO/GRTKF/IC/19/INF/8 (‘Glossary of Key Terms Related to Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge’), www.wipo.int.
WIPO/GRTKF/IC/19/INF/9 (‘Glossary of Key Terms Related to Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources’), www.wipo.int.
WIPO Revised Objectives and Principles for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions and Expressions of Folklore, www.wipo.int.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta
Rancangan Undang-undang Pengetahuan Tradisional dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional
Intergovernmental Committee on intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore
Trade Related aspect of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement
Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expression 2005
Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage 2003
The South Pacific Model Law for National Laws of 2002
Model Provisions of the UNESCO/WIPO 1982
The Tunis Model Law on Copyright for Developing Countries of 1976
The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Work (as amended on September 28, 1979)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Yenny Eta Widyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal embed or display simple machine-readable CC licensing information. This journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC). This license (CC BY NC) allows other users to re-edit / rewrite and rebuild a work non-commercially as long as the user gives credit and licenses his new work in the same domain.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
