PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PENGATURAN TINDAKAN PENYADAPAN (WIRETAPPING) DI INDONESIA DAN FILIP

Authors

  • Milda Istiqomah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2013.00601.3

Keywords:

Wiretapping

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the comparative perspective on wiretapping in investigation process based on Law Number 15 Year 2003 on Combating Criminal Acts of Terrorism Indonesia and Republict Act 9372 on the Human Security Act (HSA) of the Philippines. This study uses normative juridical method including legislative approach (statute aproach) and comparative approach. Based on the discussion, it concludes that there are some similarities and differences regarding the wiretapping based on two laws, however article Article 31 paragraph (1 (, (2), and (3) of law Number 15 Year 2003 are assumed to potentially violate human rights for the terrorist suspects.

Key words: comparative law, wiretapping, terrorism

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan tindakan penyadapan (wiretapping) terkait kewenangan penyidik dalam proses penyidikan menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 15 tahun 2003 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Indonesia dan menurut Republict Act 9372 Human Security Act (HSA) Filipina. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute aproach) dan pendekatan perbandingan (comparative approach). Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan tentang perbandingan antara tindakan penyadapan sebagai kewenangan penyidik dalam kedua undang-undang, bahwa terdapat beberapa persamaan dan perbedaan mengenai pengaturan tindakan penyadapan tersebut dimana Pasal 31 ayat (1(, (2), dan (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 15 tahun 2003 lebih berpotensi menimbulkan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia (HAM) bagi tersangka tindak pidana terorisme.

Kata kunci: perbandingan hukum, penyadapan, terorisme

Downloads

Published

2014-08-25

How to Cite

Istiqomah, M. (2014). PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PENGATURAN TINDAKAN PENYADAPAN (WIRETAPPING) DI INDONESIA DAN FILIP. Arena Hukum, 6(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2013.00601.3

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2013)

Section

Artikel

License

Copyright (c) 2013 Milda Istiqomah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This journal embed or display simple machine-readable CC licensing information. This journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC). This license (CC BY NC) allows other users to re-edit / rewrite and rebuild a work non-commercially as long as the user gives credit and licenses his new work in the same domain.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).